Demand side differential taxation of products high in GHG

This solution was shared by IFSS portal research team
09 June 2022

Description of the innovative solution

The food system is responsible for more than a quarter of all greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, most of which are related to livestock. In order to incentivize emission reductions, climate policies covering the energy factor usually envisage the pricing of GHG emissions at source, instead of targeting the consumption side. Most of the agricultural GHG emissions are related to intrinsic characteristics of the agricultural system, such as methane emissions from ruminants and nitrous oxide emissions from fertilizers, but climate-mitification options that balance agricultural output and food...

The food system is responsible for more than a quarter of all greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, most of which are related to livestock. In order to incentivize emission reductions, climate policies covering the energy factor usually envisage the pricing of GHG emissions at source, instead of targeting the consumption side. Most of the agricultural GHG emissions are related to intrinsic characteristics of the agricultural system, such as methane emissions from ruminants and nitrous oxide emissions from fertilizers, but climate-mitification options that balance agricultural output and food availability do exist. This innovation proposes demand-side policies as a viable option for addressing the environmental cost associated with food production. Levying GHG taxes on the consumption side instead of the production side has been argued to be an economically preferable approach, given the nature of agriculture described above. In addition, measures to change diets away from emission-intensive food commodities, such as meat and dairy, towards more plant-based diets are seen to offer great potential for reducing GHG emissions. Furthermore, if the health-critical food groups, such as fruits and vegetables were exempted from taxation, these measures could be associated with additional co-benefits in terms of improvements in human health.

Examples and additional resources

Real-world examples

See this solution in action in different contexts and settings around the world

Additional resources

Learn more about this solution through studies, articles, business cases, and other information

Emissions pricing of food commodities
Scientific paper
This article analyzes through mathematical models the potential mitigatory effect of emission pricing of food commodities on environmental issues.
Shared by Silvia Martinez IFSS Research Team

Contacts

Connect to others working on and with this solution around the world

No contacts yet.

Pathways to uptake

Engage with our “backcasting tool” to imagine and design “pathways to uptake” for this solution in your setting.

This process involves defining a future vision of this solution being used in your context, and then working “backwards” to identify necessary steps to achieve this vision by 2030. Going through this exercise as an individual or with a team can help to clarify the WHAT/WHEN/HOW of moving a solution (or package of solutions) towards having major impact. We hope these pathways will inspire outside-of-the-box thinking, creative approaches, and actionable concrete steps to move ideas into action.

Pathway builder
image